RATIONALITY OF ARGUMENTATION: LOGICAL RULES AND VALUES

Problem setting. During the period of expansion practice argumentation in society, thanks to media, theory is also actively developing. In process interdisciplinary research and influence irrationalism, problem rethinking rationality argumentation, conditions for its preserve civilizational orientation development modern arises. Recent publications analysis. At present stage differences correctness incorrectness proof are investigated, various concepts logic role communication, rules as a characteristic human proposed. Paper objective. The aim study reveal reasons by analyzing logical values, their relationship construction structure from evidence. main body. structural elements divided into: thesis, arguments demonstration. Arguments bases connected with thesis causation. truth implication establish strict between cause consequence. Based on certain rule, it possible obtain one or another value. It peculiarity causation that difference which modified lies. Modified changes implicit connections. Logical values implicitly related. If meaning traditional classical sense represents highest level reason, identified perfect form, then different derived (probabilities, sufficiency, etc.) associated types rationality. An essential feature ability justify. Rational reasoning related speech contexts crucial argumentation. Contextual coherence communicative nature allow us generally determine type such an argument discursive Different justification appears antecedent relations. effectiveness depends strength judgments. open means there no final rule; intersubjective; establishment choice requires strong-willed efforts reflection, involvement criteria truth.
 Conclusions research. Analysis shows possibilities intelligent activity relation limited model pure reason according rules. But forms rational truth. this case, significant man being justified through awareness occurs